← GrantSignal AIPractical resource · Pilot version · Last reviewed: 4 August 2026
Proposal Readiness and Go/No-Go Worksheet
Use this worksheet before investing substantial time in proposal preparation. It supports disciplined review; it does not decide legal eligibility or guarantee funding.
1. Call identity
Call title: __________________________________________
Official call ID: _____________________________________
Specific official URL: _________________________________
Issuing body: ________________________________________
Source checked on: ______________ Deadline/timezone: ______________
Evidence tier: ☐ VERIFIED_CURRENT ☐ PARTIAL ☐ UNVERIFIED
If the current call, status or deadline cannot be verified from a specific official source, stop at MANUAL REVIEW.
2. Strategic fit
Score 0 = no evidence, 1 = weak, 2 = adequate, 3 = strong.
| Question | Score | Evidence/note |
|---|
| Project fits official topic | ___ | |
| Problem and impact match call | ___ | |
| Technology maturity fits | ___ | |
| Expected outcome is addressed | ___ | |
| Timing is realistic | ___ | |
Subtotal: ____ / 15
3. Formal eligibility and geography
- ☐ Organisation type explicitly accepted
- ☐ Applicant and beneficiary roles distinguished
- ☐ Host-country condition verified
- ☐ Current participation/association source checked
- ☐ Funding eligibility checked separately from nationality
- ☐ Consortium requirements recorded
- ☐ Transitional conditions dated and conditional
Unresolved questions: __________________________________________
4. Proposal readiness
- ☐ Problem statement documented
- ☐ Solution sufficiently defined
- ☐ State of the art/baseline available
- ☐ Work packages or tasks credible
- ☐ Outputs and outcomes measurable
- ☐ Team roles available
- ☐ Partners identified or search realistic
- ☐ Data, facilities and access available
- ☐ IP and ethics issues identified
- ☐ Budget assumptions supported
- ☐ Internal approval/signature route known
Missing critical inputs: _________________________________________
5. Competitiveness and effort
- ☐ Official evaluation criteria located
- ☐ Excellence/innovation case credible
- ☐ Impact case credible
- ☐ Implementation capacity credible
- ☐ Differentiation is clear
- ☐ Evidence supports key claims
- ☐ Required format and length are feasible
Available preparation time: __________ Estimated effort: __________
Main competitive weakness: _________________________________
6. Decision
☐ GO — proceed to detailed assessment
☐ NO-GO — material requirement not met or opportunity expired
☐ MANUAL REVIEW — material current-call or eligibility question unresolved
Decision date: __________ Owner: __________
Reason: _________________________________________________
Next action/date: ________________________________________
7. AI-use control
- ☐ Original official source or identified extract supplied to AI
- ☐ Dates, budgets and requirements checked against source
- ☐ References retained
- ☐ Unsupported assumptions removed
- ☐ No eligibility or success claim relies on AI alone
- ☐ Human reviewer approved final record
GrantSignal rule: VERIFIED_CURRENT may support a current recommendation; PARTIAL is manual review only; UNVERIFIED is suppressed; missing facts remain UNKNOWN.
This resource is vendor-neutral and does not require a paid tool. Join the free GrantSignal bulletin →
Résumé français : cette fiche sépare l’adéquation stratégique, l’éligibilité, la préparation et la compétitivité avant une décision GO, NO-GO ou MANUAL REVIEW.
Educational resource only; not legal advice, financial advice or a funding guarantee.